When performance becomes personal
When did doing well become evidence that you were worthy? This week, The Feisty Human explores what happens when performance stops being information about what we did and starts becoming evidence of who we believe we are.
For most of my career, I was very comfortable being evaluated. Give me the criteria. Tell me what success looks like. Show me the target, and I can work with that.
Performance is measurable. Did the project succeed? Did the team deliver? Did the organization improve? Did I meet the objective? Did I do what I said I would do? Sometimes the answer was yes. Sometimes it wasn't. That's performance, and I've never had much difficulty with the idea that it should be assessed.
But somewhere along the way, many of us learn to make those results mean something much bigger. We stop simply asking, Did I do well? and start asking, What does how well I did say about me?
That's when performance becomes personal.
When the Scorecard Moves Inside
Most of us understand intellectually that our work can be evaluated. In fact, evaluation is necessary. Leaders need feedback. Employees need accountability. Organizations need standards. Students need assessment. Businesses need results. I don't want a world where nobody is accountable because we're afraid someone's feelings might get hurt.
But there's an enormous difference between evaluating what I did and determining what I am worth, and humans are remarkably good at collapsing the two.
A great presentation doesn't simply mean I gave a great presentation; it can become evidence that I'm good at this. A promotion can become proof that I'm going somewhere. Recognition can tell me I'm important. Being needed can reassure me that I matter.
Failure can travel exactly the same road in the opposite direction. The project struggled. I made the wrong decision. I didn't get the promotion. Someone criticized my work. Something I created wasn't received the way I'd hoped.
Suddenly, we're no longer examining an outcome. We're examining ourselves.
When Did Doing Well Become Evidence That You Were Worthy?
That's the question I've been sitting with:
When did doing well become evidence that you were worthy?
I don't think most of us consciously decided this. There probably wasn't a Tuesday afternoon when you announced, “From now on, I shall determine my human value according to my professional performance.” Although, knowing me, I probably would have created a spreadsheet for it.
It happens much more quietly. We learn that good grades get celebrated, competence gets trusted, achievement gets recognized, usefulness gets appreciated, reliability gets rewarded and expertise gets invited into the room. None of those things is inherently wrong. In fact, many of them are entirely appropriate responses to good performance.
The problem isn't the reward. The problem is what we sometimes make the reward mean.
Once success becomes evidence of worth, failure becomes dangerous. It's no longer simply disappointing. It's personal.
The Problem With Making Worth Earnable
There is a logical problem with trying to earn something that should never have been conditional in the first place. If I can earn my worth through achievement, then presumably I can lose it through failure.
If being useful makes me valuable, what happens when nobody needs me? If being accomplished proves that I matter, what happens when someone else outperforms me? If knowing the answer makes me credible, what happens when I don't know? If being strong makes me worthy of respect, what happens when I fall apart?
This is why the relationship between worth and performance matters so much. It isn't because performance doesn't matter.
Performance matters enormously.
We should care about the quality of our work. We should take responsibility when we get things wrong. We should develop competence, learn from feedback, repair harm, improve our skills and honour the commitments we make.
But none of those things requires us to put our humanity on the scorecard.
Your performance can be excellent, mediocre, disappointing or in serious need of improvement. It can even be unacceptable. You can make a terrible decision, fail spectacularly or discover that you simply aren't very good at something yet.
And you can still be a human being of inherent worth.
Those truths can occupy the same room.
Worth Is Not Immunity
This distinction matters because intrinsic worth can easily be misunderstood as an excuse. If my worth cannot be evaluated, does that mean nobody gets to criticize me?
Absolutely not.
Your work can be criticized. Your decisions can be challenged. Your behaviour can have consequences. You can lose the opportunity. You can fail the course. You can be wrong. You can need to apologize. You can discover that you are nowhere near as good at something as you thought you were.
Worth doesn't protect us from consequences. It protects us from turning those consequences into a verdict on our humanity.
And strangely enough, I think that can make us more accountable, not less.
If criticism of my work doesn't threaten my fundamental value, I don't have to defend myself quite so fiercely. If failure doesn't make me a failure, I can examine what happened. If being wrong doesn't make me worthless, I can admit it. If somebody else's excellence doesn't diminish me, I can learn from them instead of competing with them simply to protect myself.
Maybe uncoupling worth from performance doesn't lower the standard at all. Maybe it gives us enough safety to look at our performance more honestly.
Two Different Questions
So the next time something goes particularly well — or particularly badly — notice which question you ask.
How did I do? is a useful question. It can teach you something. It invites reflection, feedback, learning and improvement.
But if you notice yourself drifting toward What does this say about me?, stop there for a moment.
Perhaps the answer is much smaller than you've been making it. Maybe it says you prepared well. Maybe you need more practice. Maybe you made an excellent decision or a terrible one. Maybe you're developing. Maybe you weren't ready. Maybe you absolutely nailed it.
All useful information.
None of it is a measurement of your human value.
I've spent a long time thinking and teaching about this distinction, and more recently I've been writing about it too. It sits underneath much of what I've come to understand about identity, leadership and what it means to remain human in environments that are constantly measuring us. You'll see a little more of that work appearing here over the next few weeks.
For now, this is where I want to begin:
Your performance can be evaluated. Your worth cannot.
Forward, with purpose.
— Amber
Your performance can be evaluated. Your worth cannot.
If this reflection stayed with you, explore The Feisty Human: Recipes for Becoming Someone You Don’t Have to Negotiate.
Enjoyed this essay? Connect with me on LinkedIn or join the email list below to receive every new edition.
When your strength becomes your cage
What happens when the qualities that helped you succeed become qualities you no longer feel free to put down? This week, The Feisty Human explores the difference between capacity and compulsion — and why our strengths should give us more choices, not fewer.
I have spent a lot of my life being capable. Give me a problem and I'll figure it out. Put me in a messy situation and I'll organize it. Hand me responsibility and I'll carry it. Need someone to step forward? I'm probably already standing.
For a very long time, I considered this one of my greatest strengths. I still do.
But I've learned something uncomfortable about strengths:
A strength stops being a strength when you're no longer free not to use it.
That's when strength can become a cage.
The Trouble With Being Good at Something
Over the past few weeks, we've been talking about the versions of ourselves that work: the capable one, the strong one, the helper, the achiever, the peacemaker, the person who always knows what to do.
We don't develop these versions of ourselves randomly. They work. They get rewarded. And when something works particularly well, we're understandably inclined to keep using it.
But eventually, there's a question worth asking:
Can I choose not to?
Can the capable person say, “I don't know”? Can the reliable person disappoint someone? Can the helper watch somebody struggle without immediately rescuing them? Can the leader let someone else lead? Can the resilient person say, “Actually, this is too much”? Can the achiever accomplish absolutely nothing of significance today and still feel okay about themselves?
That's where strengths get interesting. Because the opposite of a strength isn't necessarily a weakness.
Sometimes it's freedom.
When Capability Becomes Compulsion
I've been thinking about the difference between being capable and needing to be capable. They're not the same thing.
One gives me options. The other removes them.
If I am capable, I can step forward when my skills are useful. If I need to be capable, I step forward because I don't know who I am if I don't.
If I'm helpful, I can offer support. If I need to be helpful, somebody else's struggle can become almost impossible for me to tolerate.
If I'm resilient, I can recover from difficult things. If I need to be resilient, I may keep enduring things I should actually leave.
If I'm independent, I can take care of myself. If I need to be independent, receiving help can feel like failure.
Same behaviour from the outside.
Very different experience on the inside.
One is capacity. The other is compulsion.
The Strength Everyone Loves
And here's where this gets particularly tricky: other people often benefit from our cages.
The employee who never says no is wonderfully dependable. The leader who carries everything makes life easier for everyone else. The peacemaker keeps uncomfortable conversations from disrupting the room. The resilient person can tolerate conditions nobody should have to tolerate. The helper is always available. The high performer keeps producing.
Of course these behaviours get rewarded. Sometimes we're even celebrated for the very patterns that are exhausting us.
That's why changing them can create friction.
The moment the reliable person says no, someone may call them difficult. When the fixer stops fixing, someone may accuse them of not caring. When the strong person finally says, “I need help,” people may not know what to do with them. When the accommodating person develops boundaries, somebody will almost certainly prefer the old version.
That doesn't automatically mean the change is healthy. Feedback still matters. Impact still matters. Self-awareness still matters.
But resistance doesn't automatically mean the change is wrong, either.
Sometimes resistance simply tells us that an old arrangement worked better for someone else.
Don't Throw Away the Strength
I'm not interested in turning our strengths into pathology.
Capability isn't a trauma response simply because you're capable. Ambition isn't unhealthy because you like accomplishing things. Helping people isn't secretly people-pleasing every time you do it. Resilience isn't dysfunction. Independence isn't avoidance. And leadership isn't ego.
Sometimes a strength is simply a strength.
The goal isn't to become suspicious of everything we're good at. The goal is to have choice.
I want to be capable without believing I must always know. I want to help without needing to be needed. I want to lead without needing to control. I want to be resilient without using resilience as an excuse to tolerate the intolerable. I want to achieve without asking achievement to prove that I matter.
I want access to my strengths.
I just don't want to live inside them.
The Freedom Test
So here's something I've started asking myself:
Can I choose the opposite?
Not forever. Not dramatically. Just sometimes.
If competence is one of my strengths, can I admit I don't know? If generosity is one of my strengths, can I decline? If independence matters to me, can I receive? If leadership comes naturally, can I follow? If achievement energizes me, can I rest? If resilience has carried me through difficult things, can I decide something isn't worth enduring?
And if doing the opposite creates disproportionate discomfort, maybe there's something worth getting curious about.
Not ashamed of.
Curious about.
Because perhaps the question isn't whether you're strong. You probably are.
The question is whether your strength belongs to you...
or whether you've started belonging to it.
Your strengths should expand the ways you can move through the world. They shouldn't reduce them.
So keep the capability. Keep the ambition. Keep the resilience. Keep the leadership. Keep whatever beautiful, hard-earned strengths have helped make you who you are.
Just make sure the door isn't locked behind you.
A strength stops being a strength when you're no longer free not to use it.
Forward, with purpose.
— Amber
Download Chapter Eleven of The Feisty Human and continue the conversation.
Enjoyed this essay? Connect with me on LinkedIn or join the email list below to receive every new edition.
The Version of You That Got Rewarded
What happens when a behaviour that earned trust, approval or belonging becomes an identity you believe you must maintain? This week, The Feisty Human explores the helper/fixer persona—and the difference between a real strength and a role you no longer feel free to leave.
There is a version of me who knows how to make things work. Give her a problem and she will find the gap. Give her a struggling team and she will create structure. Give her a difficult conversation and she will help everyone find the words. Give her something broken, confusing, unfinished or falling apart—and she will get to work.
That version of me has been very useful. She has also been heavily rewarded.
People trusted her. They relied on her. They described her as capable, resourceful and strong. They gave her more responsibility because she had already demonstrated that she could carry it. Somewhere along the way, a behaviour that worked became an identity I believed I had to maintain.
This worked. Therefore, this is who I need to be.
Rewarded Behaviours Become Roles
Most of our professional personas do not appear out of nowhere. They form around something that worked.
Maybe you were praised for being easygoing, so you became the person who never made things difficult. Maybe people admired your independence, so you stopped letting them see when you needed help. Maybe you were rewarded for producing exceptional work, so “excellent” quietly became the minimum you would allow yourself to deliver.
Maybe you became known as the calm one, the strong one, the smart one, the dependable one or the person who could always find a solution.
None of those qualities are bad. That is what makes these identities so difficult to notice. They often begin as real strengths.
The problem is not that you learned how to help, achieve, lead, organize, solve or endure. The problem begins when the behaviour stops being something you can choose and becomes something you believe you must perform in order to remain valuable.
The Helper Has to Be Needed
The helper/fixer version of me did not simply enjoy being useful. She learned to locate herself through usefulness.
If something needed doing, I knew where I belonged. If someone needed support, I knew what I could offer. If a problem appeared, I could move toward it with confidence. Problems gave me something concrete to solve, and other people’s needs gave me a role I understood.
Being effective in that role created its own kind of evidence: I am needed. I am contributing. I am valuable here.
There was rarely time to examine that evidence. Being needed creates its own momentum. There is always another problem, another person or another situation asking for attention. Reflection becomes something you will do later, when everything settles down.
But everything rarely settles down for a skilled helper. If one situation no longer needs you, it is remarkably easy to find another that does.
I did not spend much time evaluating who I was within all those needs. I kept placing myself in situations where I was needed instead. The next problem protected me from having to ask what remained when there was nothing for me to fix.
That is the hidden bargain of the helper/fixer persona. It gives you a clear role while quietly making stillness feel unfamiliar.
If I locate my value in being the person who helps, what happens when nobody needs my help? If I understand myself as the fixer, what happens when something cannot—or should not—be fixed by me? If usefulness becomes part of my identity, can I still feel steady when the most honest thing I can say is:
This is not mine to carry.
The Persona Is Not a Lie
It would be easy to describe these professional personas as false selves we need to discard. I do not think that is quite right.
The helper is real. The achiever is real. The dependable person, the peacemaker, the expert and the one who gets things done are all real. They reflect abilities we developed, choices we made and ways we learned to contribute.
But a real part of us can still become an exhausting role when we believe we are not allowed to step outside it.
The persona is not necessarily a lie. It is simply incomplete.
I can be helpful without being responsible for everything. I can recognize a solution without being the person who must implement it. I can care deeply about someone without taking ownership of their outcome. I can allow something to remain unfinished without treating that as evidence that I have failed.
Those distinctions sound simple. Living them is different.
What Did the Room Reward?
Think about the version of you that has been most successful in your professional life. What does that person know how to do? What do people consistently praise them for? What do others expect them to carry?
And what happens inside you when you cannot—or no longer want to—perform that role?
This is not an invitation to reject your strengths. It is an invitation to notice the agreement that may have formed underneath them:
I will be the capable one. I will keep the peace. I will find the answer. I will not need too much. I will make this easier for everyone else.
And in return, I will be valued here.
Most of us never consciously agreed to those terms. We simply noticed what worked and kept doing it.
This Week’s Practice
Complete this sentence:
I learned that people valued me when I was the one who ____________.
Do not overthink it. Notice the first answer that appears.
Then ask yourself:
Is this still something I choose—or something I believe I have to keep performing?
You do not have to stop being helpful, capable, reliable or strong. You do not have to reject the version of you that helped you build your life.
But you are allowed to become more than the behaviour that once earned the room’s approval.
The version of you that got rewarded may be real.
It was never the whole of you.
Forward, with purpose,
Amber
Download Chapter Eleven of The Feisty Human and continue the conversation.
Enjoyed this essay? Connect with me on LinkedIn or join the email list below to receive every new edition.